Issue |
Metall. Res. Technol.
Volume 114, Number 6, 2017
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 607 | |
Number of page(s) | 9 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/metal/2016065 | |
Published online | 19 September 2017 |
Regular Article
Methodology to assess fracture during crash simulation: fracture strain criteria and their calibration
1
ArcelorMittal Maizières Research SA, Voie Romaine,
BP30320,
57283
Maizières-les-Metz, France
2
ArcelorMittal, Automotive Products Development,
17 avenue des tilleuls,
57190
Florange, France
* e-mail: pascal.dietsch@arcelormittal.com
Received:
10
June
2016
Received in final form:
4
November
2016
Accepted:
9
November
2016
The use of Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS) has greatly increased this last decade in the automotive industry. Because of their crash performance and their weight saving potential, these grades constitute a possible solution to achieve the safety and environmental regulations objectives. Nevertheless, the increase of tensile strength of these materials is generally associated with a loss of ductility compared to conventional steels. Thus, the prediction of their failure in crash loading conditions become of great importance for the design of vehicles. This paper proposes to calibrate for any AHSS, as Dual-Phase or Press Hardened Steels, different failure criteria, available in finite element software. First, specific tests and methodologies for strain measurement needed for models calibration are exposed. Second, an overview of these tested models and the procedure applied to take into account mesh dependency are provided. Finally, simulations results are compared with experiment on a real automotive component.
Key words: failure characterization / failure prediction / crash / LS-DYNA / CrachFEM
© EDP Sciences, 2017
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.